Biggest population changes in Vikarabad district
Computed from 159 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Vikarabad district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sidloor (Chenchelam) | 1,220 | 2,856 | +134.1% |
| 2 | Thirmalapur | 789 | 1,688 | +113.9% |
| 3 | Kankanalapalle | 547 | 869 | +58.9% |
| 4 | Peddapur | 837 | 1,248 | +49.1% |
| 5 | Ravalapalle | 404 | 600 | +48.5% |
| 6 | Kothlapur Buzurg | 949 | 1,386 | +46.0% |
| 7 | Noorullapur | 209 | 302 | +44.5% |
| 8 | Ghatpalle | 528 | 757 | +43.4% |
| 9 | Polkampalle | 1,267 | 1,801 | +42.1% |
| 10 | Upparpalle | 178 | 250 | +40.5% |
| 11 | Allapur | 684 | 943 | +37.9% |
| 12 | Linganpalle | 358 | 489 | +36.6% |
| 13 | Nagasar | 879 | 1,178 | +34.0% |
| 14 | Nagaram | 1,387 | 1,850 | +33.4% |
| 15 | Nagaram | 735 | 967 | +31.6% |
| 16 | Bonkoor | 104 | 135 | +29.8% |
| 17 | Khasimpur | 1,115 | 1,446 | +29.7% |
| 18 | Kudgunta | 411 | 525 | +27.7% |
| 19 | Pothreddypalle | 557 | 711 | +27.6% |
| 20 | Yenkepalle | 741 | 940 | +26.9% |
Villages that shrank most in Vikarabad district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madanpalle | 1,337 | 809 | -39.5% |
| 2 | Ekmamidi | 5,177 | 3,136 | -39.4% |
| 3 | Sidloor Paigah | 1,701 | 1,031 | -39.4% |
| 4 | Regadmailwar | 3,410 | 2,077 | -39.1% |
| 5 | Jodandapur | 1,483 | 914 | -38.4% |
| 6 | Salimdapur | 1,407 | 879 | -37.5% |
| 7 | Erlapalle | 1,240 | 777 | -37.3% |
| 8 | Kotpalle | 5,491 | 3,474 | -36.7% |
| 9 | Antharam | 3,274 | 2,080 | -36.5% |
| 10 | Lagcherla | 2,092 | 1,361 | -34.9% |
| 11 | Narayanpur | 1,798 | 1,172 | -34.8% |
| 12 | Chilmalmailwar | 3,046 | 2,018 | -33.8% |
| 13 | Adkicherla | 2,804 | 1,864 | -33.5% |
| 14 | Neetur | 2,668 | 1,777 | -33.4% |
| 15 | Thimmareddipalle | 2,525 | 1,688 | -33.1% |
| 16 | Madharam | 2,639 | 1,785 | -32.4% |
| 17 | Bomraspet | 5,538 | 3,795 | -31.5% |
| 18 | Regondi | 1,278 | 877 | -31.4% |
| 19 | Thunkumetla | 2,847 | 1,954 | -31.4% |
| 20 | Gouraram | 1,485 | 1,035 | -30.3% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 2 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.