Biggest population changes in Wanaparthy district
Computed from 67 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Wanaparthy district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Korlakunta | 581 | 1,200 | +106.5% |
| 2 | Kalloor | 433 | 770 | +77.8% |
| 3 | Dharmapur | 907 | 1,400 | +54.4% |
| 4 | Pathapalle | 1,522 | 1,930 | +26.8% |
| 5 | Penchikalpadu | 1,281 | 1,596 | +24.6% |
| 6 | Janumpalle | 969 | 1,200 | +23.8% |
| 7 | Janampeta | 1,724 | 2,134 | +23.8% |
| 8 | Shanaipalle | 690 | 854 | +23.8% |
| 9 | Cheerkapalle | 1,350 | 1,659 | +22.9% |
| 10 | Revally | 3,422 | 4,151 | +21.3% |
| 11 | Nancharammapet | 458 | 549 | +19.9% |
| 12 | Medepalle | 1,183 | 1,412 | +19.4% |
| 13 | Rangapur | 3,519 | 4,193 | +19.1% |
| 14 | Munagamanudinne | 256 | 303 | +18.4% |
| 15 | Bandaraipakula | 1,776 | 2,071 | +16.6% |
| 16 | Balijapalle | 2,393 | 2,691 | +12.4% |
| 17 | Erladinne | 517 | 580 | +12.2% |
| 18 | Bunyadpur | 1,216 | 1,342 | +10.4% |
| 19 | Thomalapalle | 1,267 | 1,385 | +9.3% |
| 20 | Venkatapur (S) | 1,657 | 1,789 | +8.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Wanaparthy district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vallabhapur | 1,203 | 736 | -38.8% |
| 2 | Thellarallapalle | 3,935 | 2,430 | -38.3% |
| 3 | Nagapur | 3,375 | 2,121 | -37.2% |
| 4 | Manajipet | 6,169 | 3,906 | -36.7% |
| 5 | Pangal | 5,174 | 3,414 | -34.0% |
| 6 | Buddharam | 6,401 | 4,291 | -33.0% |
| 7 | Gopanpeta | 1,890 | 1,295 | -31.5% |
| 8 | Miraspalle | 2,996 | 2,081 | -30.5% |
| 9 | Pamireddipalle | 3,638 | 2,538 | -30.2% |
| 10 | Peddamandadi | 7,823 | 5,500 | -29.7% |
| 11 | Alwal | 1,751 | 1,237 | -29.4% |
| 12 | Polkepahad | 4,194 | 3,034 | -27.7% |
| 13 | Solipuram | 337 | 250 | -25.8% |
| 14 | Dattaipalle | 1,343 | 1,020 | -24.1% |
| 15 | Chityala | 4,913 | 3,777 | -23.1% |
| 16 | Peddagudem | 5,210 | 4,011 | -23.0% |
| 17 | Rajapeta | 2,625 | 2,026 | -22.8% |
| 18 | Gatlakhanapur | 2,892 | 2,247 | -22.3% |
| 19 | Konnur | 3,586 | 2,835 | -20.9% |
| 20 | Srirangapur | 8,119 | 6,455 | -20.5% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.