Biggest population changes in Warangal Rural district
Computed from 105 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Warangal Rural district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Singarajupalle | 1,326 | 2,000 | +50.8% |
| 2 | Kondapur | 695 | 1,046 | +50.5% |
| 3 | Pathipaka | 923 | 1,350 | +46.3% |
| 4 | Choudla Palle | 2,080 | 2,800 | +34.6% |
| 5 | Panikera | 1,136 | 1,520 | +33.8% |
| 6 | Asaravelli | 671 | 862 | +28.5% |
| 7 | Katakshapur | 895 | 1,135 | +26.8% |
| 8 | Malakpet | 988 | 1,224 | +23.9% |
| 9 | Topanpalle | 1,560 | 1,880 | +20.5% |
| 10 | Kowkonda | 1,930 | 2,273 | +17.8% |
| 11 | Rampur | 1,174 | 1,377 | +17.3% |
| 12 | Bodduchintalapalle | 1,197 | 1,399 | +16.9% |
| 13 | House Buzurg | 1,359 | 1,513 | +11.3% |
| 14 | Dharmaraopet | 3,337 | 3,684 | +10.4% |
| 15 | Ramteertham | 1,411 | 1,550 | +9.8% |
| 16 | Gundrepalle | 1,647 | 1,800 | +9.3% |
| 17 | Anantharam | 852 | 920 | +8.0% |
| 18 | Alamkhanipet | 3,208 | 3,394 | +5.8% |
| 19 | Kamaram | 1,107 | 1,170 | +5.7% |
| 20 | Rudragudem | 2,918 | 3,022 | +3.6% |
Villages that shrank most in Warangal Rural district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gopanapalle | 2,571 | 1,568 | -39.0% |
| 2 | Oorugonda | 5,879 | 3,633 | -38.2% |
| 3 | Konkapaka | 3,270 | 2,041 | -37.6% |
| 4 | Gundlapahad | 1,919 | 1,198 | -37.6% |
| 5 | Laxmipur | 3,117 | 1,961 | -37.1% |
| 6 | Govindapur | 2,768 | 1,751 | -36.7% |
| 7 | Ravoor | 1,585 | 1,009 | -36.3% |
| 8 | Mahammadapur | 3,340 | 2,132 | -36.2% |
| 9 | Bandauthapur | 2,837 | 1,812 | -36.1% |
| 10 | Adavi Rangapur | 1,319 | 843 | -36.1% |
| 11 | Maheshwaram | 5,725 | 3,669 | -35.9% |
| 12 | Rajupet | 2,168 | 1,403 | -35.3% |
| 13 | Peddapur | 8,196 | 5,340 | -34.9% |
| 14 | Lohitha | 2,235 | 1,457 | -34.8% |
| 15 | Pedda Kodepaka | 5,580 | 3,684 | -34.0% |
| 16 | Nagaram | 3,025 | 2,003 | -33.8% |
| 17 | Gatlakaniparthy | 3,302 | 2,195 | -33.5% |
| 18 | Gattikal | 1,735 | 1,160 | -33.1% |
| 19 | Chinnakorpole | 1,739 | 1,176 | -32.4% |
| 20 | Nallabelle | 4,527 | 3,165 | -30.1% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 3 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.