Biggest population changes in Warangal Urban district
Computed from 36 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Warangal Urban district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kyathampalli | 1,548 | 2,250 | +45.4% |
| 2 | Nagaram | 4,077 | 4,530 | +11.1% |
| 3 | Mallikudurla | 2,442 | 2,692 | +10.2% |
| 4 | Velair | 9,662 | 10,605 | +9.8% |
| 5 | Veeranarayanapur | 1,130 | 1,191 | +5.4% |
| 6 | Jaigiri | 2,421 | 2,551 | +5.4% |
| 7 | Gunded | 2,050 | 2,150 | +4.9% |
| 8 | Jujnoor | 204 | 208 | +2.0% |
| 9 | Peddapendyal | 7,152 | 7,259 | +1.5% |
| 10 | Ananthasagar | 1,974 | 1,978 | +0.2% |
| 11 | Sudanpalle | 1,201 | 1,202 | +0.1% |
| 12 | Vallabhapur | 1,805 | 1,806 | +0.1% |
| 13 | Venkatapuram | 4,433 | 4,434 | +0.0% |
| 14 | Uppal | 6,867 | 6,225 | -9.3% |
| 15 | Gatlanarsingapur | 4,626 | 4,101 | -11.3% |
| 16 | Peechera | 5,306 | 4,681 | -11.8% |
| 17 | Marripalligudem | 4,573 | 4,029 | -11.9% |
| 18 | Dharmsagar | 9,350 | 8,225 | -12.0% |
| 19 | Kothulnaduma | 1,698 | 1,493 | -12.1% |
| 20 | Mallareddipalle | 3,100 | 2,714 | -12.4% |
Villages that shrank most in Warangal Urban district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vangara | 6,081 | 3,798 | -37.5% |
| 2 | Vangapalle | 4,970 | 3,106 | -37.5% |
| 3 | Kondaparthy | 6,439 | 4,089 | -36.5% |
| 4 | Pembarthy | 2,377 | 1,553 | -34.7% |
| 5 | Sanigaram | 5,624 | 3,772 | -32.9% |
| 6 | Inavole | 7,441 | 5,120 | -31.2% |
| 7 | Thatikayala | 3,486 | 2,494 | -28.5% |
| 8 | Elkathurthi | 6,827 | 4,994 | -26.9% |
| 9 | Mallaram | 3,986 | 2,918 | -26.8% |
| 10 | Thimmapur | 1,975 | 1,497 | -24.2% |
| 11 | Punnole | 4,900 | 3,810 | -22.2% |
| 12 | Musthafapur | 2,511 | 2,010 | -19.9% |
| 13 | Kannur | 3,020 | 2,503 | -17.1% |
| 14 | Koppur | 3,055 | 2,533 | -17.1% |
| 15 | Jhanakipur | 1,460 | 1,248 | -14.5% |
| 16 | Baopet | 2,668 | 2,298 | -13.9% |
| 17 | Mallareddipalle | 3,100 | 2,714 | -12.4% |
| 18 | Kothulnaduma | 1,698 | 1,493 | -12.1% |
| 19 | Dharmsagar | 9,350 | 8,225 | -12.0% |
| 20 | Marripalligudem | 4,573 | 4,029 | -11.9% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.