Biggest population changes in Tripura
Computed from 601 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Tripura
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harerkhola | 692 | 1,698 | +145.4% |
| 2 | Tuichhama | 1,379 | 3,305 | +139.7% |
| 3 | Dakshin Bilaschhera | 611 | 1,446 | +136.7% |
| 4 | Kamalakhal | 544 | 1,278 | +134.9% |
| 5 | Hirachhera | 1,687 | 3,850 | +128.2% |
| 6 | Khupilong | 1,520 | 3,467 | +128.1% |
| 7 | Photamati | 886 | 2,018 | +127.8% |
| 8 | Ampichhera | 758 | 1,725 | +127.6% |
| 9 | Baghaichhera | 1,701 | 3,804 | +123.6% |
| 10 | Jagabandhupara | 1,365 | 3,050 | +123.4% |
| 11 | Paschim Patichhari | 1,853 | 4,129 | +122.8% |
| 12 | Srinathpur | 2,469 | 5,499 | +122.7% |
| 13 | Lakshmichhera | 1,567 | 3,471 | +121.5% |
| 14 | Sonapur | 529 | 1,169 | +121.0% |
| 15 | Siddhinagar | 891 | 1,960 | +120.0% |
| 16 | Jarulchhera | 469 | 997 | +112.6% |
| 17 | Jharjharia | 1,112 | 2,360 | +112.2% |
| 18 | Sipasing | 114 | 241 | +111.4% |
| 19 | Lakshmipati | 1,422 | 2,948 | +107.3% |
| 20 | Bhabanipur | 1,765 | 3,656 | +107.1% |
Villages that shrank most in Tripura
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salgara | 5,596 | 3,387 | -39.5% |
| 2 | Muhuripur Reserve Forest | 9,633 | 5,840 | -39.4% |
| 3 | Sakbari | 1,965 | 1,192 | -39.3% |
| 4 | Jampuijala | 4,117 | 2,508 | -39.1% |
| 5 | Kanchanchhera | 4,148 | 2,529 | -39.0% |
| 6 | Pecharthal | 6,781 | 4,137 | -39.0% |
| 7 | Purba Noagaon | 7,440 | 4,540 | -39.0% |
| 8 | Ganganagar | 6,771 | 4,138 | -38.9% |
| 9 | Khilpara | 7,665 | 4,691 | -38.8% |
| 10 | Teliamura | 5,299 | 3,243 | -38.8% |
| 11 | Srinagar | 3,512 | 2,158 | -38.5% |
| 12 | Paschim Kanchanbari | 6,649 | 4,087 | -38.5% |
| 13 | Katalutma | 4,376 | 2,691 | -38.5% |
| 14 | Rowa | 6,544 | 4,029 | -38.4% |
| 15 | Chamubasti | 1,295 | 800 | -38.2% |
| 16 | Paschim Karamchhera | 3,575 | 2,211 | -38.1% |
| 17 | Kakraban | 8,774 | 5,444 | -38.0% |
| 18 | Salema | 4,516 | 2,803 | -37.9% |
| 19 | Patnipara | 3,458 | 2,149 | -37.9% |
| 20 | Gajaria | 3,668 | 2,280 | -37.8% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 4 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
5 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.