Biggest population changes in Dhalai district
Computed from 113 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Dhalai district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harerkhola | 692 | 1,698 | +145.4% |
| 2 | Tuichhama | 1,379 | 3,305 | +139.7% |
| 3 | Dakshin Bilaschhera | 611 | 1,446 | +136.7% |
| 4 | Kamalakhal | 544 | 1,278 | +134.9% |
| 5 | Jagabandhupara | 1,365 | 3,050 | +123.4% |
| 6 | Sonapur | 529 | 1,169 | +121.0% |
| 7 | Jarulchhera | 469 | 997 | +112.6% |
| 8 | Sipasing | 114 | 241 | +111.4% |
| 9 | Joychandrapara | 497 | 1,013 | +103.8% |
| 10 | Dakshin Longtarai | 1,048 | 2,090 | +99.4% |
| 11 | Siddhapara | 277 | 533 | +92.4% |
| 12 | Dalapatipara | 1,532 | 2,940 | +91.9% |
| 13 | Purba Chhamanu | 1,716 | 3,256 | +89.7% |
| 14 | Dabbari | 1,154 | 2,171 | +88.1% |
| 15 | Bishnupur | 780 | 1,449 | +85.8% |
| 16 | Ratannagar | 1,637 | 3,006 | +83.6% |
| 17 | Karamapara | 282 | 510 | +80.8% |
| 18 | Durgachhera | 2,226 | 3,975 | +78.6% |
| 19 | Gangaprasadpara | 413 | 737 | +78.5% |
| 20 | Chhetrai | 583 | 1,029 | +76.5% |
Villages that shrank most in Dhalai district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Katalutma | 4,376 | 2,691 | -38.5% |
| 2 | Paschim Karamchhera | 3,575 | 2,211 | -38.1% |
| 3 | Salema | 4,516 | 2,803 | -37.9% |
| 4 | Purba Potachhera | 4,252 | 2,671 | -37.2% |
| 5 | Kachuchhera | 5,806 | 3,654 | -37.1% |
| 6 | Michhuria | 2,553 | 1,627 | -36.3% |
| 7 | Kamalachhera | 2,963 | 1,952 | -34.1% |
| 8 | Central Catchment Reserve Forest | 6,799 | 4,546 | -33.1% |
| 9 | Ulemchhera | 870 | 602 | -30.8% |
| 10 | Sarma | 5,612 | 3,903 | -30.4% |
| 11 | Lalchhari | 3,664 | 2,581 | -29.6% |
| 12 | Srirampur | 2,217 | 1,571 | -29.1% |
| 13 | Lalchhera | 4,603 | 3,270 | -29.0% |
| 14 | Abhangha | 5,137 | 3,656 | -28.8% |
| 15 | Chakmapara | 1,392 | 995 | -28.5% |
| 16 | Ganganagar | 3,946 | 2,890 | -26.8% |
| 17 | Kulai Reserve Forest Extension | 2,138 | 1,592 | -25.5% |
| 18 | Mahabir | 3,409 | 2,574 | -24.5% |
| 19 | Radharambari | 523 | 396 | -24.3% |
| 20 | Kulai Reserve Forest | 2,525 | 1,933 | -23.4% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.