Biggest population changes in Khowai district
Computed from 55 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Khowai district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shantinagar | 1,898 | 3,561 | +87.6% |
| 2 | Badlabari | 1,359 | 2,440 | +79.5% |
| 3 | Brahmachhera | 1,630 | 2,857 | +75.3% |
| 4 | Ramdayalbari | 1,846 | 3,129 | +69.5% |
| 5 | Lakshminarayanpur | 3,490 | 5,380 | +54.1% |
| 6 | Ramkrishnabari | 485 | 726 | +49.7% |
| 7 | Sriramkhara | 2,040 | 2,914 | +42.8% |
| 8 | Shikaribari | 1,549 | 2,173 | +40.3% |
| 9 | Sukhiabari | 193 | 266 | +37.8% |
| 10 | Paschim Bachaibari | 2,038 | 2,807 | +37.7% |
| 11 | Yajnakabrabari | 2,027 | 2,778 | +37.0% |
| 12 | Tuihachingbari | 1,941 | 2,642 | +36.1% |
| 13 | Maidanbari | 928 | 1,252 | +34.9% |
| 14 | Uttar Padmabil | 2,224 | 2,947 | +32.5% |
| 15 | Dakshin Padmabil | 2,437 | 3,076 | +26.2% |
| 16 | Uttar Ramchandraghat | 2,564 | 3,233 | +26.1% |
| 17 | Bagabil | 1,632 | 2,040 | +25.0% |
| 18 | Ramkrishnapur | 1,960 | 2,425 | +23.7% |
| 19 | Gayamanibari | 1,810 | 2,218 | +22.5% |
| 20 | Purba Belchhera | 1,890 | 2,294 | +21.4% |
Villages that shrank most in Khowai district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Teliamura | 5,299 | 3,243 | -38.8% |
| 2 | Chamubasti | 1,295 | 800 | -38.2% |
| 3 | Purba Lakshmichhera | 2,739 | 1,720 | -37.2% |
| 4 | Durgapur | 4,556 | 3,093 | -32.1% |
| 5 | Dhalabil | 4,079 | 2,775 | -32.0% |
| 6 | Kamalnagar | 4,625 | 3,266 | -29.4% |
| 7 | Purba Rajnagar | 4,301 | 3,110 | -27.7% |
| 8 | Dakshin Ramchandraghat | 4,403 | 3,230 | -26.6% |
| 9 | Kunjaban | 6,870 | 5,061 | -26.3% |
| 10 | Akharabari | 2,590 | 1,921 | -25.8% |
| 11 | Ghilatali | 5,898 | 4,456 | -24.4% |
| 12 | Uttar Pulinpur | 5,476 | 4,174 | -23.8% |
| 13 | Hawaibari | 5,580 | 4,319 | -22.6% |
| 14 | Dwarikapur | 5,642 | 4,494 | -20.4% |
| 15 | Paschim Champachhera | 4,533 | 3,906 | -13.8% |
| 16 | Dakshin Pulinpur | 4,620 | 4,002 | -13.4% |
| 17 | Atharamura Reserve Forest | 3,487 | 3,050 | -12.5% |
| 18 | Uttar Pramodnagar | 3,374 | 3,126 | -7.3% |
| 19 | Paharmura | 2,761 | 2,671 | -3.3% |
| 20 | Banbazar | 2,214 | 2,159 | -2.5% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.