Biggest population changes in North Tripura district
Computed from 57 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in North Tripura district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laljuri | 1,126 | 2,055 | +82.5% |
| 2 | Purba Manpui | 797 | 1,349 | +69.3% |
| 3 | Manu Chailengta Reserve Forest | 1,462 | 2,449 | +67.5% |
| 4 | Balidhum | 1,500 | 2,496 | +66.4% |
| 5 | Bhagyapur | 3,789 | 5,945 | +56.9% |
| 6 | Ujjan Machhmara Reserve Forest | 6,354 | 9,656 | +52.0% |
| 7 | Ragna | 3,043 | 4,545 | +49.4% |
| 8 | Kamarmara | 515 | 744 | +44.5% |
| 9 | Piarachhera | 1,836 | 2,510 | +36.7% |
| 10 | Kalagang | 886 | 1,210 | +36.6% |
| 11 | Bilthai | 2,598 | 3,402 | +30.9% |
| 12 | Dakshin Padmabill | 2,628 | 3,398 | +29.3% |
| 13 | Ranibari | 1,493 | 1,916 | +28.3% |
| 14 | Pipalachhera | 1,879 | 2,349 | +25.0% |
| 15 | Brajendranagar | 3,529 | 4,344 | +23.1% |
| 16 | Radhapur | 3,826 | 4,665 | +21.9% |
| 17 | Ramnagar | 2,489 | 3,024 | +21.5% |
| 18 | Sarala | 1,720 | 2,057 | +19.6% |
| 19 | Tlaksi | 314 | 372 | +18.5% |
| 20 | Bangsul | 895 | 1,050 | +17.3% |
Villages that shrank most in North Tripura district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kanchanchhera | 4,148 | 2,529 | -39.0% |
| 2 | Ganganagar | 6,771 | 4,138 | -38.9% |
| 3 | Rowa | 6,544 | 4,029 | -38.4% |
| 4 | Indurail | 1,641 | 1,033 | -37.0% |
| 5 | Deochhera | 4,843 | 3,092 | -36.2% |
| 6 | Banglabari | 405 | 263 | -35.1% |
| 7 | Uttar Padmabill | 5,873 | 3,840 | -34.6% |
| 8 | Dasda Lakshmipur | 5,835 | 3,862 | -33.8% |
| 9 | Jubarajnagar | 4,425 | 2,963 | -33.0% |
| 10 | Saraspur | 7,541 | 5,054 | -33.0% |
| 11 | Belianchief | 1,309 | 904 | -30.9% |
| 12 | Uptakhali | 4,675 | 3,260 | -30.3% |
| 13 | Kameswar | 7,535 | 5,446 | -27.7% |
| 14 | Dashmanipara | 771 | 560 | -27.4% |
| 15 | Narendranagar | 1,542 | 1,144 | -25.8% |
| 16 | Dhupirband | 7,006 | 5,259 | -24.9% |
| 17 | Rahumchhera | 1,689 | 1,336 | -20.9% |
| 18 | Sanichhera | 3,919 | 3,128 | -20.2% |
| 19 | Purba Halflong | 2,395 | 1,921 | -19.8% |
| 20 | Purba Tilthai | 4,275 | 3,649 | -14.6% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.