Biggest population changes in South Tripura district
Computed from 95 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in South Tripura district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paschim Patichhari | 1,853 | 4,129 | +122.8% |
| 2 | Lakshmichhera | 1,567 | 3,471 | +121.5% |
| 3 | Siddhinagar | 891 | 1,960 | +120.0% |
| 4 | Uttar Takmachhera | 1,693 | 3,358 | +98.3% |
| 5 | Champaknagar | 1,750 | 3,334 | +90.5% |
| 6 | Paschim Muhuripur | 1,124 | 2,127 | +89.2% |
| 7 | Uttar Debipur | 1,749 | 3,074 | +75.8% |
| 8 | Rajapur | 2,156 | 3,406 | +58.0% |
| 9 | Chhaigharia | 1,702 | 2,558 | +50.3% |
| 10 | Tairumachhera | 2,107 | 3,100 | +47.1% |
| 11 | Bagmara | 1,441 | 1,998 | +38.6% |
| 12 | Tekkatulsi Reserve Forest | 616 | 841 | +36.5% |
| 13 | Purba Anandapur | 2,566 | 3,503 | +36.5% |
| 14 | Uttar Bharatchandranagar | 3,851 | 5,217 | +35.5% |
| 15 | Tebaria | 2,894 | 3,802 | +31.4% |
| 16 | Rajdharpur | 699 | 917 | +31.2% |
| 17 | Rajnagar | 1,973 | 2,581 | +30.8% |
| 18 | Aliamara | 446 | 580 | +30.0% |
| 19 | Uttar Taichhama | 1,331 | 1,649 | +23.9% |
| 20 | Uttar Bijoypur | 1,743 | 2,158 | +23.8% |
Villages that shrank most in South Tripura district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muhuripur Reserve Forest | 9,633 | 5,840 | -39.4% |
| 2 | Sakbari | 1,965 | 1,192 | -39.3% |
| 3 | Srinagar | 3,512 | 2,158 | -38.5% |
| 4 | Bardosh | 3,451 | 2,146 | -37.8% |
| 5 | Bhairabnagar | 1,662 | 1,060 | -36.2% |
| 6 | Dakshin Manubangkul | 2,929 | 1,875 | -36.0% |
| 7 | Dakshin Hichhachhera | 5,499 | 3,521 | -36.0% |
| 8 | Phulchhari | 4,316 | 2,815 | -34.8% |
| 9 | Dakshin Taichhama | 1,607 | 1,056 | -34.3% |
| 10 | Dolbari | 3,297 | 2,210 | -33.0% |
| 11 | Purba Jalefa | 4,150 | 2,782 | -33.0% |
| 12 | Bagafa | 2,889 | 1,983 | -31.4% |
| 13 | Paschim Manu | 5,001 | 3,437 | -31.3% |
| 14 | Kalabaria | 6,788 | 4,761 | -29.9% |
| 15 | Ishanchandranagar | 4,784 | 3,428 | -28.3% |
| 16 | Paikhola | 3,920 | 2,839 | -27.6% |
| 17 | Uttar Hichhachhera | 5,292 | 3,850 | -27.3% |
| 18 | Uttar Krishnapur | 5,469 | 3,982 | -27.2% |
| 19 | Chalitachhera | 2,242 | 1,641 | -26.8% |
| 20 | Uttar Srirampur | 2,897 | 2,145 | -26.0% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 3 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
3 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.