GaonData

Biggest population changes in Banda district

Computed from 602 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Banda district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Saya Bisanda 364 882 +142.3%
2 Parsaulee Kamasin 5,208 12,520 +140.4%
3 Raghoupur Kamasin 1,978 4,680 +136.6%
4 Kharaunch Mahuva 1,488 3,500 +135.2%
5 Parsidhapur Naraini 426 978 +129.6%
6 Kayal Baberu 1,755 4,008 +128.4%
7 Benda Tindwari 7,085 16,090 +127.1%
8 Mudi Naraini 1,057 2,400 +127.1%
9 Paras Baberu 2,814 6,310 +124.2%
10 Bahadurpur Kalinzar Naraini 3,567 7,847 +120.0%
11 Pahi Naraini 657 1,421 +116.3%
12 Shiv Baberu 4,603 9,694 +110.6%
13 Marauli Badokhar Khurd 2,770 5,806 +109.6%
14 Khohi Mahuva 775 1,600 +106.5%
15 Goura Lakhanpur Kamasin 268 547 +104.1%
16 Majhiva Sani Bisanda 4,724 9,622 +103.7%
17 Sabada Jaspura 6,599 13,299 +101.5%
18 Marka Baberu 15,563 31,308 +101.2%
19 Atarahat Tindwari 4,072 8,190 +101.1%
20 Partappur Naraini 478 950 +98.7%

Villages that shrank most in Banda district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kheda Kamasin 1,881 1,293 -31.3%
2 Jalalpur Baberu 3,037 2,194 -27.8%
3 Bhujrakh Tindwari 3,360 2,634 -21.6%
4 Kalyanpur Naraini 2,093 1,808 -13.6%
5 Macha Tindwari 1,555 1,556 +0.1%
6 Chhapar Tindwari 1,766 1,774 +0.5%
7 Nada Deo Jaspura 2,948 2,970 +0.8%
8 Bhatha Jaspura 759 765 +0.8%
9 Jarar Mahuva 2,588 2,610 +0.8%
10 Lamehta Bisanda 1,762 1,780 +1.0%
11 Etavan Bisanda 2,275 2,320 +2.0%
12 Ekauna Bisanda 3,040 3,102 +2.0%
13 Umaree Baberu 1,083 1,106 +2.1%
14 Jaspura Jaspura 7,535 7,730 +2.6%
15 Durai Mafi Mahuva 1,206 1,250 +3.6%
16 Barehta Jaspura 2,865 2,990 +4.4%
17 Rachha Bisanda 979 1,025 +4.7%
18 Kheriya Naraini 1,081 1,135 +5.0%
19 Girwan Mahuva 5,462 5,741 +5.1%
20 Sarswaha Mahuva 820 862 +5.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 14 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 14 excluded in total. How the limits are set.