Biggest population changes in Bhadohi district
Computed from 939 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Bhadohi district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beras pur | 2,338 | 5,800 | +148.1% |
| 2 | Bankat Z.Madho Rampur | 312 | 771 | +147.1% |
| 3 | Chauguna | 506 | 1,250 | +147.0% |
| 4 | Shivsewak Patti | 1,265 | 3,099 | +145.0% |
| 5 | Chak Jura | 134 | 325 | +142.5% |
| 6 | Jagdishpur Brahmnal | 664 | 1,600 | +141.0% |
| 7 | Chandapur | 236 | 568 | +140.7% |
| 8 | Bisauli Kripalpur | 1,615 | 3,820 | +136.5% |
| 9 | Vanjari | 763 | 1,800 | +135.9% |
| 10 | Chak Loka | 229 | 536 | +134.1% |
| 11 | Rajjupur | 126 | 294 | +133.3% |
| 12 | Dhan Tulsi Uparwar | 2,079 | 4,850 | +133.3% |
| 13 | Bisunpur | 1,326 | 3,090 | +133.0% |
| 14 | Chak Sanath | 203 | 470 | +131.5% |
| 15 | Umari | 1,455 | 3,340 | +129.6% |
| 16 | Gowali | 1,751 | 4,000 | +128.4% |
| 17 | Mavaiya Vara Goti Uparwar | 417 | 950 | +127.8% |
| 18 | Govind Patti | 900 | 2,040 | +126.7% |
| 19 | Mahmadpur Uparwar | 643 | 1,440 | +124.0% |
| 20 | Tulsipur | 397 | 889 | +123.9% |
Villages that shrank most in Bhadohi district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rauri | 166 | 102 | -38.5% |
| 2 | Rajputan Z. Gohilon | 399 | 246 | -38.4% |
| 3 | Merhi | 323 | 205 | -36.5% |
| 4 | Basupur Uparwar | 622 | 400 | -35.7% |
| 5 | Singhpur | 1,186 | 852 | -28.2% |
| 6 | Joharpur | 1,431 | 1,045 | -27.0% |
| 7 | Gyanpur | 1,676 | 1,235 | -26.3% |
| 8 | Poore Bahuriya | 1,239 | 921 | -25.7% |
| 9 | Ramaipur N. Bankat | 738 | 570 | -22.8% |
| 10 | Vihaspur | 544 | 430 | -21.0% |
| 11 | Chak Sarnath | 442 | 350 | -20.8% |
| 12 | Kishun Deopur | 1,194 | 960 | -19.6% |
| 13 | Girdharpur | 1,353 | 1,117 | -17.4% |
| 14 | Sultanpur | 372 | 310 | -16.7% |
| 15 | Saravan | 661 | 560 | -15.3% |
| 16 | Kanthipur | 121 | 103 | -14.9% |
| 17 | Manapur Or Malepur | 1,818 | 1,552 | -14.6% |
| 18 | Rajaipur Z. Gohlaw | 1,502 | 1,322 | -12.0% |
| 19 | Chaura Kala | 1,395 | 1,246 | -10.7% |
| 20 | Ghuripur | 959 | 865 | -9.8% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
42 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
42 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.