Biggest population changes in Gautam Buddha Nagar district
Computed from 91 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Gautam Buddha Nagar district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nagala Chiti | 561 | 920 | +64.0% |
| 2 | Chiti | 3,524 | 5,250 | +49.0% |
| 3 | Makanpur Khadar | 1,510 | 2,210 | +46.4% |
| 4 | Rasoolpur Dasana | 1,717 | 2,505 | +45.9% |
| 5 | Ismail Nagar Urf Bhoyra | 437 | 630 | +44.2% |
| 6 | Mangroli | 1,809 | 2,512 | +38.9% |
| 7 | Bisahda | 6,669 | 9,222 | +38.3% |
| 8 | Jamalpur | 1,912 | 2,570 | +34.4% |
| 9 | Chuharpur Bangar | 1,683 | 2,210 | +31.3% |
| 10 | Aurangabad Urf Humayunpur | 697 | 900 | +29.1% |
| 11 | Daya Nagar | 537 | 693 | +29.1% |
| 12 | Amanullapur Urf Mahara | 1,639 | 2,095 | +27.8% |
| 13 | Milak Khandera | 503 | 642 | +27.6% |
| 14 | Bhabokara | 1,654 | 2,100 | +27.0% |
| 15 | Nagla Chamroo | 1,735 | 2,194 | +26.5% |
| 16 | Noorpur | 3,404 | 4,289 | +26.0% |
| 17 | Sadipur Chhidoli | 2,748 | 3,451 | +25.6% |
| 18 | Ibadullapur Urf Badalpur | 3,716 | 4,656 | +25.3% |
| 19 | Saithali | 3,799 | 4,738 | +24.7% |
| 20 | Tatarpur | 1,575 | 1,961 | +24.5% |
Villages that shrank most in Gautam Buddha Nagar district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sirsa | 1,328 | 949 | -28.5% |
| 2 | Dalelpur | 169 | 154 | -8.9% |
| 3 | Uplarasi | 1,388 | 1,400 | +0.9% |
| 4 | Girdharpur Sunarasi | 1,719 | 1,736 | +1.0% |
| 5 | Fazayalpur | 1,285 | 1,300 | +1.2% |
| 6 | Jaitwapur Navarpur | 2,026 | 2,060 | +1.7% |
| 7 | Kudi Khera | 1,978 | 2,012 | +1.7% |
| 8 | Chandrawal | 489 | 498 | +1.8% |
| 9 | Shahpur Khurd | 463 | 472 | +1.9% |
| 10 | Dujana | 9,021 | 9,201 | +2.0% |
| 11 | Anandpur | 1,272 | 1,298 | +2.0% |
| 12 | Chak Senpur Urf Dhanibas | 1,359 | 1,402 | +3.2% |
| 13 | Mirpur Kachh Urf Kanigarhi | 3,088 | 3,190 | +3.3% |
| 14 | Alampur Iathla Urf Lodona | 2,426 | 2,507 | +3.3% |
| 15 | Talabpur Urf Hathipur | 664 | 697 | +5.0% |
| 16 | Salepur | 1,425 | 1,496 | +5.0% |
| 17 | Chithara | 7,656 | 8,038 | +5.0% |
| 18 | Duriyai | 2,846 | 2,988 | +5.0% |
| 19 | Nagla Nainsukh | 1,544 | 1,621 | +5.0% |
| 20 | Bisnoli | 3,419 | 3,590 | +5.0% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.