Biggest population changes in Kaushambi district
Computed from 550 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Kaushambi district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Samaspur | 4,852 | 12,000 | +147.3% |
| 2 | Aladinpur Tikari | 230 | 560 | +143.5% |
| 3 | Nasarullapur | 362 | 872 | +140.9% |
| 4 | Dheraha | 2,373 | 5,675 | +139.2% |
| 5 | Chak Sahabuddinpur | 933 | 2,215 | +137.4% |
| 6 | Shahpur | 2,830 | 6,620 | +133.9% |
| 7 | Muhamdabad | 1,130 | 2,557 | +126.3% |
| 8 | Kaini | 3,226 | 7,228 | +124.0% |
| 9 | Hishampur Marho | 1,717 | 3,825 | +122.8% |
| 10 | Yadubirpur | 236 | 525 | +122.5% |
| 11 | Chittapur | 1,744 | 3,850 | +120.8% |
| 12 | Chauradih | 3,164 | 6,875 | +117.3% |
| 13 | Ranipur | 1,600 | 3,476 | +117.3% |
| 14 | Parash | 4,304 | 9,292 | +115.9% |
| 15 | Padumnathpur Sursaini | 1,669 | 3,600 | +115.7% |
| 16 | Dedhawal | 2,575 | 5,281 | +105.1% |
| 17 | Rauje Shef Khan | 588 | 1,201 | +104.3% |
| 18 | Bariyawan | 2,156 | 4,212 | +95.4% |
| 19 | Tarna | 1,540 | 3,007 | +95.3% |
| 20 | Biroli | 2,244 | 4,300 | +91.6% |
Villages that shrank most in Kaushambi district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pawaiyan | 1,282 | 800 | -37.6% |
| 2 | Mohiuddinpur Urf Lodhaur | 2,109 | 1,400 | -33.6% |
| 3 | Baraisa | 2,689 | 2,082 | -22.6% |
| 4 | Novapur Deh Mafi | 296 | 230 | -22.3% |
| 5 | Sallaha | 636 | 500 | -21.4% |
| 6 | Koora | 873 | 700 | -19.8% |
| 7 | Durgapur | 2,611 | 2,100 | -19.6% |
| 8 | Jot Khatoon | 359 | 300 | -16.4% |
| 9 | Malipur Urf Mahraj Ganj | 702 | 605 | -13.8% |
| 10 | Ghosiya | 3,559 | 3,080 | -13.5% |
| 11 | Kuwandeeh | 1,226 | 1,100 | -10.3% |
| 12 | Sanai | 334 | 300 | -10.2% |
| 13 | Ibrahimpur | 2,001 | 1,832 | -8.4% |
| 14 | Tajpur | 106 | 98 | -7.5% |
| 15 | Jafarpur Mahauwa | 4,471 | 4,287 | -4.1% |
| 16 | Jajouli | 1,866 | 1,800 | -3.5% |
| 17 | Adahara | 2,838 | 2,800 | -1.3% |
| 18 | Gouhani | 600 | 592 | -1.3% |
| 19 | Dariyapur | 1,747 | 1,725 | -1.3% |
| 20 | Para Hasanpur | 1,568 | 1,550 | -1.1% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.