GaonData

Biggest population changes in Lalitpur district

Computed from 639 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Lalitpur district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Badraun Jakhaura 993 2,453 +147.0%
2 Bhainsai Jakhaura 628 1,530 +143.6%
3 Khadera Jakhaura 1,465 3,552 +142.5%
4 Ghutari Jakhaura 431 1,030 +139.0%
5 Tera Birdha 2,093 5,000 +138.9%
6 Serwans Kalan Talbehat 2,776 6,610 +138.1%
7 Burhwar Jakhaura 5,173 12,000 +132.0%
8 Sukadi Mehroni 1,505 3,487 +131.7%
9 Bant Birdha 3,421 7,815 +128.4%
10 Pyasa Mehroni 988 2,250 +127.7%
11 Mainwara Jakhaura 2,984 6,702 +124.6%
12 Chauki Mehroni 1,017 2,251 +121.3%
13 Padwan Mehroni 2,611 5,758 +120.5%
14 Jharkon Birdha 2,610 5,702 +118.5%
15 Nauhar Khurd Jakhaura 862 1,878 +117.9%
16 Pali Rural Birdha 1,271 2,750 +116.4%
17 Kandhari Kalan Talbehat 2,370 5,100 +115.2%
18 Mairti Khurd Birdha 113 242 +114.2%
19 Miyao Bar 2,246 4,600 +104.8%
20 Lalaun Talbehat 1,413 2,842 +101.1%

Villages that shrank most in Lalitpur district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Karari Jakhaura 643 450 -30.0%
2 Genchwara Jakhaura 695 510 -26.6%
3 Lakhanger Mandawara 748 550 -26.5%
4 Panchora Jakhaura 1,080 800 -25.9%
5 Rampura Birdha 415 326 -21.4%
6 Bari Khurd Talbehat 923 760 -17.7%
7 Budhni Narhat Mandawara 271 225 -17.0%
8 Didora Talbehat 323 310 -4.0%
9 Bamhori Kalan Jakhaura 3,336 3,212 -3.7%
10 Balarguwan Talbehat 358 350 -2.2%
11 Budhendi Jakhaura 789 800 +1.4%
12 Chaumahu Mehroni 245 250 +2.0%
13 Chhipai Jakhaura 1,706 1,741 +2.0%
14 Bar Bar 9,326 9,528 +2.2%
15 Bakhtar Jakhaura 978 1,012 +3.5%
16 Darutalla Mandawara 375 389 +3.7%
17 Naigaon Kalan Jakhaura 873 908 +4.0%
18 Kusmand Mehroni 1,847 1,931 +4.5%
19 Gona Mandawara 5,355 5,600 +4.6%
20 Karokhat Talbehat 100 105 +5.0%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 20 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 20 excluded in total. How the limits are set.