Biggest population changes in Maharajganj district
Computed from 1,033 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Maharajganj district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gopalpur Tappa Lehra | 1,185 | 2,948 | +148.8% |
| 2 | Rampurwa | 649 | 1,590 | +145.0% |
| 3 | Pipara | 1,581 | 3,840 | +142.9% |
| 4 | Dathauli | 1,261 | 3,036 | +140.8% |
| 5 | Kandhpur Van Tangia | 306 | 733 | +139.5% |
| 6 | Luthhahva | 784 | 1,847 | +135.6% |
| 7 | Bariya | 921 | 2,150 | +133.4% |
| 8 | Mohanapur | 2,190 | 5,100 | +132.9% |
| 9 | Gopala | 2,904 | 6,736 | +132.0% |
| 10 | Bagha | 2,182 | 5,000 | +129.2% |
| 11 | Forest Village-24 | 1,052 | 2,400 | +128.1% |
| 12 | Navabi Ghat | 443 | 1,000 | +125.7% |
| 13 | Jungal Pharjand Ali | 1,670 | 3,768 | +125.6% |
| 14 | Laxmipur | 2,040 | 4,500 | +120.6% |
| 15 | Pokharbhinda Urf Bangahva | 1,478 | 3,210 | +117.2% |
| 16 | Sirsia | 1,072 | 2,318 | +116.2% |
| 17 | Hardi Dali | 2,714 | 5,813 | +114.2% |
| 18 | Khajuria | 2,768 | 5,923 | +114.0% |
| 19 | Rajawal | 1,114 | 2,360 | +111.8% |
| 20 | Pipara Bari | 1,224 | 2,560 | +109.2% |
Villages that shrank most in Maharajganj district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belauha Ghat | 154 | 95 | -38.3% |
| 2 | Baraipar | 664 | 425 | -36.0% |
| 3 | Achal Garh | 281 | 180 | -35.9% |
| 4 | Laxmipur Khurd | 3,754 | 2,560 | -31.8% |
| 5 | Mangalpur | 2,098 | 1,479 | -29.5% |
| 6 | Rajmandir | 1,848 | 1,340 | -27.5% |
| 7 | Baithpurwa Urf Gauri | 2,324 | 1,690 | -27.3% |
| 8 | Kot Kamhariya | 3,256 | 2,380 | -26.9% |
| 9 | Nauwabari | 562 | 412 | -26.7% |
| 10 | Belauha Darra | 2,018 | 1,500 | -25.7% |
| 11 | Jai Sri | 1,772 | 1,350 | -23.8% |
| 12 | Bhargawa Urf Laxmipur | 2,142 | 1,650 | -23.0% |
| 13 | Bishkhop | 3,826 | 3,000 | -21.6% |
| 14 | Bairia | 1,536 | 1,255 | -18.3% |
| 15 | Shishvariya Urf Shismahal | 1,578 | 1,290 | -18.3% |
| 16 | Pipar Pati | 284 | 238 | -16.2% |
| 17 | Khamhaura | 2,894 | 2,448 | -15.4% |
| 18 | Bhainsi | 1,988 | 1,714 | -13.8% |
| 19 | Rajapur | 1,420 | 1,256 | -11.6% |
| 20 | Basdila | 3,321 | 3,000 | -9.7% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
12 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
12 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.