Biggest population changes in Pilibhit district
Computed from 1,094 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Pilibhit district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ullika | 307 | 760 | +147.6% |
| 2 | Behri Ehatmali | 490 | 1,190 | +142.9% |
| 3 | Mirpur Bahanpur | 6,668 | 16,168 | +142.5% |
| 4 | Sultanpur | 4,787 | 11,550 | +141.3% |
| 5 | Pandari | 3,344 | 8,000 | +139.2% |
| 6 | Painiya Ramkishan | 2,182 | 5,200 | +138.3% |
| 7 | Muradpur Mati | 831 | 1,895 | +128.0% |
| 8 | Takia | 564 | 1,285 | +127.8% |
| 9 | Harraipur | 371 | 845 | +127.8% |
| 10 | Kishanpur Haripur | 3,646 | 8,300 | +127.7% |
| 11 | Siya Bari Patti | 1,119 | 2,531 | +126.2% |
| 12 | Bhoora | 380 | 850 | +123.7% |
| 13 | Arjunpur Must. | 1,418 | 3,147 | +121.9% |
| 14 | Ankoda | 1,366 | 3,000 | +119.6% |
| 15 | Dandia Bhagat | 2,044 | 4,450 | +117.7% |
| 16 | Pipria Karam | 1,150 | 2,500 | +117.4% |
| 17 | Dandia Raji | 782 | 1,700 | +117.4% |
| 18 | Garwa Khera | 320 | 694 | +116.9% |
| 19 | Dhakia T. Maharajpur | 898 | 1,945 | +116.6% |
| 20 | Shastri Nagar | 901 | 1,935 | +114.8% |
Villages that shrank most in Pilibhit district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deen Nagar | 679 | 416 | -38.7% |
| 2 | Rampura Ujhainia Ehatmali | 134 | 84 | -37.3% |
| 3 | Haripur T. Ajitpur Bilha | 197 | 136 | -31.0% |
| 4 | Chant Firojpur | 2,495 | 1,775 | -28.9% |
| 5 | Dhanega | 2,049 | 1,500 | -26.8% |
| 6 | Gulria T.Sujnee | 456 | 358 | -21.5% |
| 7 | Amiratpur T. Ghungchahai | 255 | 207 | -18.8% |
| 8 | Andabojhi | 532 | 432 | -18.8% |
| 9 | Galra Machwapur | 1,340 | 1,132 | -15.5% |
| 10 | Bhagtania | 121 | 103 | -14.9% |
| 11 | Bhoora Gorakh Dibbi | 668 | 580 | -13.2% |
| 12 | Grant No21 Urf Dhakkachat | 3,678 | 3,250 | -11.6% |
| 13 | Pachtaur | 190 | 170 | -10.5% |
| 14 | Nawajpur T.Chandpur | 245 | 220 | -10.2% |
| 15 | Khakuma | 1,057 | 953 | -9.8% |
| 16 | Lohanna | 110 | 100 | -9.1% |
| 17 | Maniharia | 1,427 | 1,301 | -8.8% |
| 18 | Makarandpur J. Puranpur | 208 | 190 | -8.7% |
| 19 | Radheta Must. | 1,994 | 1,856 | -6.9% |
| 20 | Khajuria Nibiram | 1,852 | 1,734 | -6.4% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
90 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
90 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.