GaonData

Biggest population changes in Shamli district

Computed from 266 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Shamli district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Tisang Un 1,235 2,574 +108.4%
2 Garhi Pukhta Rural Un 314 634 +101.9%
3 Naunagali Un 2,215 4,170 +88.3%
4 Chonda Heri Un 912 1,580 +73.3%
5 Audari Un 582 1,001 +72.0%
6 Thana Bhawan(Rural) Thana Bhawan 8,738 15,000 +71.7%
7 Dargahpur Un 2,115 3,627 +71.5%
8 Sakauti Un 1,658 2,680 +61.6%
9 Yunispur Thana Bhawan 669 1,066 +59.3%
10 Khanpur Shamli 1,733 2,758 +59.1%
11 Bhameri Shahpur Un 2,301 3,611 +56.9%
12 Alauddinpur Un 601 930 +54.7%
13 Ghazipura Kairana 660 1,012 +53.3%
14 Bhandaura Thana Bhawan 2,744 4,040 +47.2%
15 Hoshang Pur Un 972 1,414 +45.5%
16 Jhinjhana Rural Un 1,228 1,785 +45.4%
17 Chausana Jaddid Un 1,112 1,615 +45.2%
18 Taharpur Un 730 1,060 +45.2%
19 Khanpur Un 1,773 2,556 +44.2%
20 Ramra Kairana 6,781 9,750 +43.8%

Villages that shrank most in Shamli district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bhatti Mazra Un 648 446 -31.2%
2 Khanpur Thana Bhawan 2,378 1,927 -19.0%
3 Jalalpur Shamli 2,023 1,852 -8.4%
4 Hingokheri Kairana 1,665 1,627 -2.3%
5 Nala Kandhla 7,976 8,000 +0.3%
6 Kabeerpur Non Ahatmali Un 1,678 1,688 +0.6%
7 Odri Un 2,454 2,470 +0.7%
8 Ud Pur Un 2,446 2,466 +0.8%
9 Fatehpur Ahatmali Un 1,247 1,262 +1.2%
10 Peer Khera Un 1,620 1,640 +1.2%
11 Shital Garhi Un 499 506 +1.4%
12 Harsana Un 2,630 2,700 +2.7%
13 Bunta Thana Bhawan 6,075 6,244 +2.8%
14 Bidauli Un 3,233 3,330 +3.0%
15 Miyan Kasba Ahatmali Un 327 337 +3.1%
16 Dakhori Jamalpur Thana Bhawan 2,576 2,676 +3.9%
17 Taharpur Bhabisa Kandhla 7,114 7,411 +4.2%
18 Ghissugarh Kairana 630 658 +4.4%
19 Bhari Un 3,275 3,426 +4.6%
20 Thirwa Thana Bhawan 464 487 +5.0%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 2 excluded in total. How the limits are set.