GaonData

Biggest population changes in Almora district

Computed from 1,336 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Almora district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Dugari Auliya urf ramela dungari Takula 237 589 +148.5%
2 Bakh Madhye Damudhara Hawalbag 190 463 +143.7%
3 Batuliya Dwarahat 109 265 +143.1%
4 Majurjethua Chaukhutiya 148 354 +139.2%
5 Sakar Hawalbag 295 704 +138.6%
6 Bintola Talla Hawalbag 105 250 +138.1%
7 Jaminiwar Dwarahat 200 476 +138.0%
8 Adhuriya Takula 228 542 +137.7%
9 Talli Riuni Dwarahat 1,042 2,432 +133.4%
10 Kusnyaari Dwarahat 370 860 +132.4%
11 Silpar Lamgara 377 861 +128.4%
12 Kafal Kot Hawalbag 212 480 +126.4%
13 Bisarakhet Syaldey 220 486 +120.9%
14 Bughad Lamgara 138 300 +117.4%
15 Pokhari Talli Sult 196 426 +117.3%
16 Sunari Takula 628 1,363 +117.0%
17 Kunj Lamgara 303 656 +116.5%
18 Naya Sirkot Dhauladevi 280 602 +115.0%
19 Sela Dhauladevi 141 302 +114.2%
20 Nag Joshi Takula 163 348 +113.5%

Villages that shrank most in Almora district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Gurura Takula 875 532 -39.2%
2 Kaula Dwarahat 538 332 -38.3%
3 Tholi Bhikiyasain 221 140 -36.6%
4 Naugaon Bhikiyasain 153 97 -36.6%
5 Udalikhan Chaukhutiya 464 295 -36.4%
6 Paner Gaon Avam Chak Aliyagarh Dwarahat 424 270 -36.3%
7 Kafulti Tarikhet 118 76 -35.6%
8 Jaicholi Takula 620 400 -35.5%
9 Naikana Bhikiyasain 234 151 -35.5%
10 Binoli Bhikiyasain 133 87 -34.6%
11 Taya Sult 377 250 -33.7%
12 Adigaon Kanhodiya Chaukhutiya 382 254 -33.5%
13 Lal Nagari Syaldey 598 400 -33.1%
14 Birot Syaldey 106 72 -32.1%
15 Sail Gunth Hawalbag 1,109 765 -31.0%
16 Ararirajwar Syaldey 286 199 -30.4%
17 Arari Bist Syaldey 553 385 -30.4%
18 Dhari Hawalbag 393 277 -29.5%
19 Bhanti Bhikiyasain 285 201 -29.5%
20 Chari Kyari Sult 783 558 -28.7%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 416 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 3 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 419 excluded in total. How the limits are set.