GaonData

Biggest population changes in Pauri Garhwal district

Computed from 1,111 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Pauri Garhwal district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Ghiri Kaljikhal 107 265 +147.7%
2 Kota Bironkhal 221 544 +146.2%
3 Bughani Khirsu 127 288 +126.8%
4 Raira Zahrikhal 125 256 +104.8%
5 Jhurgun Nainidanda 108 219 +102.8%
6 Bhaiswada Khirsu 354 717 +102.5%
7 Panchtoda Thalisain 213 429 +101.4%
8 Molthi Thalisain 108 216 +100.0%
9 Roille Thalisain 736 1,460 +98.4%
10 Chamasudhar Ekeshwar 184 365 +98.4%
11 Hansyudi Thalisain 157 311 +98.1%
12 Marada Ekeshwar 193 379 +96.4%
13 Moli Zahrikhal 102 200 +96.1%
14 Syousal Thalisain 209 409 +95.7%
15 Sundar Gaon Thalisain 245 474 +93.5%
16 Lwenda Talla Nainidanda 201 386 +92.0%
17 Chopra Khirsu 443 846 +91.0%
18 Nao Gaon Pajyana Thalisain 166 317 +91.0%
19 Judalun Nainidanda 260 486 +86.9%
20 Chaukhal Khirsu 165 307 +86.1%

Villages that shrank most in Pauri Garhwal district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Birgana Bironkhal 206 125 -39.3%
2 Shivladh Bironkhal 192 118 -38.5%
3 Kwali Pauri 172 106 -38.4%
4 Dadogi Kot 202 125 -38.1%
5 Fabsola Kaljikhal 161 100 -37.9%
6 Ringwarh Gaon Dwarikhal 209 130 -37.8%
7 Degoli Nainidanda 289 180 -37.7%
8 Gundinda Bironkhal 239 150 -37.2%
9 Bhamrai Bironkhal 207 130 -37.2%
10 Jiwaye Bironkhal 500 315 -37.0%
11 Gwen Bara Dwarikhal 474 300 -36.7%
12 Khaloo Khirsu 142 90 -36.6%
13 Dang Thalisain 215 137 -36.3%
14 Kotli Bironkhal 144 92 -36.1%
15 Rigalta Talla Nainidanda 172 110 -36.0%
16 Fatehpur Rikhnikhal 117 75 -35.9%
17 Bamar Khola Rikhnikhal 189 122 -35.5%
18 Bawasa Talla Bironkhal 170 110 -35.3%
19 Bandil Dwarikhal 100 65 -35.0%
20 Dhanaun Malla Pauri 169 110 -34.9%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 745 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 746 excluded in total. How the limits are set.