GaonData

Biggest population changes in Uttar Kashi district

Computed from 559 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Uttar Kashi district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kotiyal Gaon Naugaon 414 1,032 +149.3%
2 Pipal Khanda Chinyalisaur 219 545 +148.9%
3 Kunara Mori 182 450 +147.3%
4 Darmali Dunda 250 600 +140.0%
5 Katkhan Chinyalisaur 152 361 +137.5%
6 Balari Naugaon 103 239 +132.0%
7 Mani Bari Chinyalisaur 334 761 +127.8%
8 Dandalgaon Naugaon 278 629 +126.3%
9 Jugiara Dunda 116 260 +124.1%
10 Saransh Mori 260 581 +123.5%
11 Badsi Chinyalisaur 415 871 +109.9%
12 Jogat Bichlla Chinyalisaur 388 795 +104.9%
13 Kisanpur Bhatwari 955 1,935 +102.6%
14 Badhar Gaon Chinyalisaur 257 520 +102.3%
15 Rastari Naugaon 145 290 +100.0%
16 Gundiyar Gaon Purola 1,253 2,500 +99.5%
17 Gamari Chinyalisaur 323 630 +95.0%
18 Sarph Chinyalisaur 295 568 +92.5%
19 Ramoli Chinyalisaur 213 408 +91.5%
20 Pujyar Gaon Chinyalisaur 183 350 +91.3%

Villages that shrank most in Uttar Kashi district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Karara (Kurura) Purola 667 417 -37.5%
2 Bhatwari Bhatwari 1,268 794 -37.4%
3 Khurmola Dunda 726 472 -35.0%
4 Sangrali Bhatwari 859 575 -33.1%
5 Malla Bhatwari 849 596 -29.8%
6 Chhiwala Purola 425 302 -28.9%
7 Pasa Mori 258 188 -27.1%
8 Fold Dunda 1,298 960 -26.0%
9 Chhara Purola 477 365 -23.5%
10 Matiyali Naugaon 625 490 -21.6%
11 Bhatiya Naugaon 1,193 949 -20.4%
12 Dang Bhatwari 1,640 1,310 -20.1%
13 Aungee Bhatwari 302 246 -18.5%
14 Bongari Bhatwari 570 475 -16.7%
15 Khamundi Malli Naugaon 313 262 -16.3%
16 Dewti Mori 236 200 -15.3%
17 Thali Mori 368 315 -14.4%
18 Jadao Bhatwari 132 115 -12.9%
19 Khalsi Chinyalisaur 1,731 1,510 -12.8%
20 Monda Mori 378 335 -11.4%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 43 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 43 excluded in total. How the limits are set.