Biggest population changes in Alipurduar district
Computed from 305 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Alipurduar district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dakshin Panialguri | 4,677 | 10,703 | +128.8% |
| 2 | Dakshin Majherdabri | 1,739 | 3,887 | +123.5% |
| 3 | Beech Tea Garden | 6,898 | 15,234 | +120.8% |
| 4 | Rahimpur Tea Garden | 1,721 | 3,800 | +120.8% |
| 5 | Putimari | 2,040 | 4,501 | +120.6% |
| 6 | Uttar Shibkata | 3,016 | 6,597 | +118.7% |
| 7 | Satkodali | 1,884 | 4,109 | +118.1% |
| 8 | Dakshin Dhalkar | 1,703 | 3,665 | +115.2% |
| 9 | Uttar Majherdabri | 2,558 | 5,503 | +115.1% |
| 10 | Bhasadabri | 1,645 | 3,493 | +112.3% |
| 11 | Purbba Majherdabri Tea Garden | 2,832 | 5,735 | +102.5% |
| 12 | Uttar Barajhar Forest | 1,783 | 3,597 | +101.7% |
| 13 | Dakshin Shibkata | 2,300 | 4,577 | +99.0% |
| 14 | Uttar Panialguri | 3,896 | 7,741 | +98.7% |
| 15 | Shrinathpur Tea Garden | 1,579 | 3,125 | +97.9% |
| 16 | Gopimohan Tea Garden | 8,290 | 15,856 | +91.3% |
| 17 | Dakshin Rangali Baznar | 2,992 | 5,691 | +90.2% |
| 18 | Mathura Tea Garden | 9,181 | 16,344 | +78.0% |
| 19 | Bharnobari Tea Garden | 7,057 | 11,949 | +69.3% |
| 20 | Sarugaon | 1,429 | 2,360 | +65.2% |
Villages that shrank most in Alipurduar district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paschim Majherdabri Tea Garden | 1,965 | 1,264 | -35.7% |
| 2 | Chapaguri | 2,088 | 1,497 | -28.3% |
| 3 | Uttar Mandabari | 3,481 | 2,615 | -24.9% |
| 4 | Bhalka Forest | 1,438 | 1,132 | -21.3% |
| 5 | Birpara Tea Garden | 42,080 | 35,926 | -14.6% |
| 6 | Paschim Chak Chaka | 2,547 | 2,270 | -10.9% |
| 7 | Prodhanpara | 4,023 | 3,795 | -5.7% |
| 8 | Dheklapara Tea Garden | 2,643 | 2,581 | -2.4% |
| 9 | Radhanagar | 2,080 | 2,039 | -2.0% |
| 10 | Paschim Narathali | 4,665 | 4,640 | -0.5% |
| 11 | Dakhin Kamakhyaguri | 3,824 | 3,818 | -0.2% |
| 12 | Paschim Barachouki | 4,566 | 4,561 | -0.1% |
| 13 | Madhya Kamakhyaguri | 4,759 | 4,755 | -0.1% |
| 14 | Suripara | 3,025 | 3,045 | +0.7% |
| 15 | Banchukamari | 3,724 | 3,750 | +0.7% |
| 16 | Nabanagar | 4,719 | 4,760 | +0.9% |
| 17 | Harinathpur | 3,844 | 3,880 | +0.9% |
| 18 | Purbba Jhar Beltali | 4,144 | 4,200 | +1.4% |
| 19 | Madhya Deogaon | 3,156 | 3,200 | +1.4% |
| 20 | Mairadanga | 6,167 | 6,255 | +1.4% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.