GaonData

Biggest population changes in Purulia district

Computed from 2,218 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Purulia district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kerawari Jhalda-I 1,145 2,792 +143.8%
2 Chamardag Jhalda-I 607 1,458 +140.2%
3 Magha Jhalda-I 758 1,780 +134.8%
4 Mrigipahari Kashipur 557 1,300 +133.4%
5 Dabar Purulia-Ii 1,227 2,750 +124.1%
6 Chipingdih Barabazar 473 1,060 +124.1%
7 Goaladi Para 214 471 +120.1%
8 Simni Jhalda-Ii 1,327 2,900 +118.5%
9 Tuitanr Bundwan 154 335 +117.5%
10 Naudiha (P) Purulia-Ii 2,765 5,784 +109.2%
11 Chaupad Jhalda-I 861 1,759 +104.3%
12 Pathakdi Para 582 1,180 +102.8%
13 Rajadera Jhalda-Ii 502 1,016 +102.4%
14 Garurbasa Hura 593 1,200 +102.4%
15 Kanthali Jhalda-Ii 505 1,020 +102.0%
16 Kapasgora Hura 638 1,280 +100.6%
17 Manpur Arsha 176 350 +98.9%
18 Hurra Para 502 982 +95.6%
19 Dayaramdi Para 572 1,112 +94.4%
20 Panrra Jhalda-Ii 1,225 2,360 +92.7%

Villages that shrank most in Purulia district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bara Mamro Manbazar-Ii 1,477 895 -39.4%
2 Baradahi Alias Dhadkidi Puncha 429 267 -37.8%
3 Chirudih Barabazar 953 605 -36.5%
4 Ganruburu Alias Brahmandi Jhalda-I 275 175 -36.4%
5 Krishtapur Manbazar-Ii 745 496 -33.4%
6 Poradih Bundwan 813 550 -32.4%
7 Dhatla Kashipur 974 670 -31.2%
8 Kapishta Kashipur 246 173 -29.7%
9 Raidi Jhalda-I 737 520 -29.4%
10 Kantagora Bundwan 737 531 -27.9%
11 Poradi Manbazar-I 704 510 -27.6%
12 Sindruli Bundwan 244 181 -25.8%
13 Intakora Para 1,112 837 -24.7%
14 Gundligora Arsha 208 160 -23.1%
15 Layekdi Raghunath Pur-I 398 311 -21.9%
16 Parbad Kashitanr Balarampur 1,521 1,192 -21.6%
17 Lalpur Raghunathpur-Ii 318 250 -21.4%
18 Kudna Bagmundi 1,137 900 -20.8%
19 Shusina Manbazar-Ii 650 515 -20.8%
20 Jibanpur Kashipur 575 460 -20.0%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 81 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 81 excluded in total. How the limits are set.