GaonData

Biggest population changes in Anjaw district

Computed from 46 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Anjaw district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Nilang Hayuliang 101 130 +28.7%
2 Tafraliang Hayuliang 164 200 +21.9%
3 Britgong Hayuliang 101 122 +20.8%
4 Goiliang Hayuliang 140 163 +16.4%
5 Naraliang Hayuliang 107 123 +14.9%
6 Loiliang Manchal 121 139 +14.9%
7 Chambab Manchal 123 141 +14.6%
8 Kasanglat Hayuliang 125 143 +14.4%
9 Ngi Hawai-Walong 160 182 +13.8%
10 Chungung Hawai-Walong 172 194 +12.8%
11 Roiliang Chaglagam 133 150 +12.8%
12 Manchal-I Manchal 108 121 +12.0%
13 Chameliang Hayuliang 113 126 +11.5%
14 Gab Manchal 144 159 +10.4%
15 Chirang Hayuliang 109 120 +10.1%
16 Swami Camp Hayuliang 212 232 +9.4%
17 Phanglonglat Manchal 138 151 +9.4%
18 Manjuliang Manchal 138 151 +9.4%
19 Nukung Hawai-Walong 107 117 +9.3%
20 Khupa Township Hayuliang 375 410 +9.3%

Villages that shrank most in Anjaw district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Walong BRTF Camp Hawai-Walong 109 98 -10.1%
2 Hayuliang Hayuliang 1,834 1,846 +0.7%
3 Kibithoo Hawai-Walong 723 734 +1.5%
4 Tapang Hayuliang 130 132 +1.5%
5 Kromna Chaglagam 139 142 +2.2%
6 Halaikrong Hawai-Walong 148 153 +3.4%
7 Air Field Ziro Point Hayuliang 280 290 +3.6%
8 Amliang Hayuliang 336 351 +4.5%
9 Watong Hawai-Walong 289 302 +4.5%
10 Dav Bridge Point Hayuliang 105 110 +4.8%
11 Khupa village(khupaliang) Hayuliang 330 346 +4.8%
12 Charnai Hawai-Walong 138 145 +5.1%
13 Walong-II Hawai-Walong 392 412 +5.1%
14 Weumliang Hawai-Walong 131 138 +5.3%
15 Kalai Hawai-Walong 142 151 +6.3%
16 Quibang Manchal 139 148 +6.5%
17 Tehuliang Manchal 161 172 +6.8%
18 Chipru Chaglagam 142 152 +7.0%
19 Tamblu Hawai-Walong 172 185 +7.6%
20 Longling Hawai-Walong 166 179 +7.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 175 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 175 excluded in total. How the limits are set.