GaonData

Biggest population changes in Kurung Kumey district

Computed from 117 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Kurung Kumey district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Pado I Parsiparlo 133 320 +140.6%
2 Lower Lichila Sarli 142 330 +132.4%
3 Lee Sarli 123 260 +111.4%
4 Upper Lichila Sarli 109 225 +106.4%
5 Sangkun Koloriang 189 383 +102.7%
6 Nade Sarli 122 240 +96.7%
7 Langbang Parsiparlo 258 500 +93.8%
8 Mangdo Parsiparlo 129 250 +93.8%
9 Pakba Koloriang 175 332 +89.7%
10 Pachang Parsiparlo 161 300 +86.3%
11 Leya Parsiparlo 164 300 +82.9%
12 Taram Parsiparlo 164 300 +82.9%
13 Renchiporiang -I Parsiparlo 165 300 +81.8%
14 Yarba-I Parsiparlo 142 250 +76.1%
15 Papin Koloriang 103 180 +74.8%
16 Segriang Parsiparlo 157 270 +72.0%
17 Parsi-Parlo H.Q. Parsiparlo 234 400 +70.9%
18 Furek Koloriang 124 210 +69.3%
19 Pariang Parsiparlo 122 200 +63.9%
20 Mangio Parsiparlo 123 200 +62.6%

Villages that shrank most in Kurung Kumey district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Pung Rung Sangram 267 270 +1.1%
2 Gangte Sangram 348 355 +2.0%
3 Leel Sangram 253 260 +2.8%
4 Kambang Sangram 321 330 +2.8%
5 Raikpobe Sangram 131 135 +3.0%
6 Chingliang Sangram 237 245 +3.4%
7 Peel Sangram 285 295 +3.5%
8 Sangme Sangram 308 320 +3.9%
9 Hocho Sangram 149 155 +4.0%
10 Tumrung Sangram 173 180 +4.0%
11 Satum Koloriang 144 150 +4.2%
12 Niayahutung Sangram 115 120 +4.3%
13 Taipa Koloriang 115 120 +4.3%
14 Niangpo Sangram 177 185 +4.5%
15 Hote Sangram 220 230 +4.5%
16 Dengba Sangram 162 170 +4.9%
17 Jeevandept Koloriang 219 230 +5.0%
18 Kerium Hapa Sangram 190 200 +5.3%
19 Tajilangpo Sangram 114 120 +5.3%
20 Tarik Parsiparlo 237 250 +5.5%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 118 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 118 excluded in total. How the limits are set.