GaonData

Biggest population changes in Upper Siang district

Computed from 45 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Upper Siang district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Damro-II Mariyang 300 700 +133.3%
2 Lower Dalbing Mariyang 509 987 +93.9%
3 Bomi Mariyang 532 997 +87.4%
4 New Millang Mariyang 606 1,117 +84.3%
5 Padu Tangkum Geku 448 820 +83.0%
6 Gosang Jengging 196 340 +73.5%
7 Milang Karket Mariyang 240 377 +57.1%
8 Kumku Geku 539 840 +55.8%
9 Jomoh-Kupak Geku 390 600 +53.9%
10 Damro Gidum East Mariyang 421 642 +52.5%
11 Komkar(Sizer) Geku 257 390 +51.8%
12 Janbo Jengging 301 415 +37.9%
13 Nyukong Singa Gelling 112 150 +33.9%
14 Ngaming Tuting 472 580 +22.9%
15 Pokbir Tuting 219 269 +22.8%
16 Zido Tuting 124 152 +22.6%
17 Yortung Singa Gelling 118 142 +20.3%
18 Upper Millang Mariyang 598 719 +20.2%
19 Tashigong Singa Gelling 117 140 +19.7%
20 Sikadine Geku 186 222 +19.4%

Villages that shrank most in Upper Siang district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kopu Singa Gelling 186 134 -28.0%
2 Damro-I Mariyang 664 520 -21.7%
3 Boom Geku 170 146 -14.1%
4 Komkar (Buksang) Upper Geku 407 350 -14.0%
5 Jeru Geku 366 350 -4.4%
6 Bomdo Jengging 444 435 -2.0%
7 Katan H.Q. Geku 573 580 +1.2%
8 Peram Geku 429 438 +2.1%
9 Ramku Geku 214 220 +2.8%
10 Pongging Geku 339 350 +3.2%
11 Likor Tuting 251 261 +4.0%
12 Ramsing Jengging 293 310 +5.8%
13 Kugging Singa Gelling 156 170 +9.0%
14 Payindem Singa Gelling 147 162 +10.2%
15 Mankota Singa Gelling 177 196 +10.7%
16 Bishing Singa Gelling 121 135 +11.6%
17 Geku H.Q. Geku 820 915 +11.6%
18 Adipasi-Sibuk Mariyang 721 812 +12.6%
19 Singa (Yamelling) Singa Gelling 176 200 +13.6%
20 Gelling H.Q. Singa Gelling 123 140 +13.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 13 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 13 excluded in total. How the limits are set.