Biggest population changes in Patna district
Computed from 1,128 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Patna district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diara Maranchi Urf Kasaha | 3,636 | 9,070 | +149.4% |
| 2 | Navhi | 3,223 | 8,000 | +148.2% |
| 3 | Badpur | 1,860 | 4,600 | +147.3% |
| 4 | Bauwan | 1,305 | 3,200 | +145.2% |
| 5 | Misi | 3,835 | 9,224 | +140.5% |
| 6 | Dihra | 1,350 | 3,200 | +137.0% |
| 7 | Daudpur Jiuri | 4,477 | 10,500 | +134.5% |
| 8 | Lachhumanpur | 2,637 | 6,156 | +133.4% |
| 9 | Nadiawan | 695 | 1,620 | +133.1% |
| 10 | Dalanpur | 459 | 1,065 | +132.0% |
| 11 | Sihora | 1,211 | 2,800 | +131.2% |
| 12 | Mungila | 3,037 | 7,000 | +130.5% |
| 13 | Mahua Bigha | 470 | 1,078 | +129.4% |
| 14 | Harpur Ankuri | 2,810 | 6,435 | +129.0% |
| 15 | Naraina | 1,289 | 2,930 | +127.3% |
| 16 | Pansari | 661 | 1,500 | +126.9% |
| 17 | Saraia | 1,391 | 3,125 | +124.7% |
| 18 | Mohanpur | 897 | 2,015 | +124.6% |
| 19 | Lodipur | 1,721 | 3,864 | +124.5% |
| 20 | Bhagwatipur Karmor | 2,295 | 5,142 | +124.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Patna district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sikandarpur | 2,099 | 1,300 | -38.1% |
| 2 | Rajipur | 4,509 | 2,800 | -37.9% |
| 3 | Adla | 2,634 | 1,650 | -37.4% |
| 4 | Pitambarpur | 2,878 | 1,872 | -35.0% |
| 5 | Ekdanga | 5,336 | 3,500 | -34.4% |
| 6 | Niman | 2,425 | 1,604 | -33.9% |
| 7 | Tilakpura | 1,129 | 750 | -33.6% |
| 8 | Singhara | 5,535 | 3,754 | -32.2% |
| 9 | Deokali | 1,579 | 1,096 | -30.6% |
| 10 | Sultanpur | 2,677 | 1,860 | -30.5% |
| 11 | Sikandra | 1,333 | 928 | -30.4% |
| 12 | Tengraila Barka | 3,906 | 2,780 | -28.8% |
| 13 | Lahsuna | 1,745 | 1,245 | -28.6% |
| 14 | Dahiya | 3,801 | 2,780 | -26.9% |
| 15 | Karanja | 3,845 | 2,820 | -26.7% |
| 16 | Rampur | 1,273 | 950 | -25.4% |
| 17 | Madari Chak | 1,515 | 1,138 | -24.9% |
| 18 | Hetanpur | 5,312 | 4,010 | -24.5% |
| 19 | Pokharpar | 1,834 | 1,400 | -23.7% |
| 20 | Pothi | 4,194 | 3,255 | -22.4% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
3 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.