GaonData

Biggest population changes in Surguja district

Computed from 458 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Surguja district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Laigu Batauli 492 1,225 +149.0%
2 Krishanapur Ambikapur 634 1,563 +146.5%
3 Sureshpur Sitapur 726 1,745 +140.4%
4 Kishunnagar Ambikapur 656 1,563 +138.3%
5 Basen Udaipur 570 1,131 +98.4%
6 Amgaon Lundra 612 1,200 +96.1%
7 Pent Mainpat 1,562 3,022 +93.5%
8 Samaniya Mainpat 888 1,709 +92.5%
9 Kunkuri Khurd Mainpat 653 1,255 +92.2%
10 Bhalu Kachhar Ambikapur 815 1,565 +92.0%
11 Bargai Ambikapur 920 1,763 +91.6%
12 Labji Lakhanpur 711 1,362 +91.6%
13 Kishunpur Ambikapur 383 722 +88.5%
14 Guturma Sitapur 1,804 3,315 +83.8%
15 Sontarai Sitapur 2,430 4,174 +71.8%
16 Biniya Lakhanpur 555 948 +70.8%
17 Ulkiya Sitapur 2,354 4,019 +70.7%
18 Pratappur Lakhanpur 998 1,684 +68.7%
19 Kundeli Udaipur 294 495 +68.4%
20 Khairwar Ambikapur 3,274 5,504 +68.1%

Villages that shrank most in Surguja district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Dhanaura Lakhanpur 684 444 -35.1%
2 Kardana Batauli 945 639 -32.4%
3 Rampur Lakhanpur 465 319 -31.4%
4 Harra Tikra Ambikapur 1,598 1,118 -30.0%
5 Amdala Lakhanpur 1,059 756 -28.6%
6 Latori Lakhanpur 2,452 1,798 -26.7%
7 Kalyanpur Ambikapur 477 356 -25.4%
8 Sanibarra Udaipur 842 638 -24.2%
9 Keshma Udaipur 1,090 839 -23.0%
10 Jhumarpara Ambikapur 417 322 -22.8%
11 Lalmati Lundra 967 750 -22.4%
12 Ganjhadand Lundra 441 350 -20.6%
13 Badani Jharia Ambikapur 701 558 -20.4%
14 Saskalo Ambikapur 1,047 865 -17.4%
15 Jamdarra Lakhanpur 477 405 -15.1%
16 Patkura Lakhanpur 1,725 1,468 -14.9%
17 Mendra Kalan Ambikapur 2,065 1,790 -13.3%
18 Kulhadi Ambikapur 736 640 -13.0%
19 Jiwiliya Lakhanpur 393 345 -12.2%
20 Keori Lakhanpur 1,343 1,200 -10.7%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 1 excluded in total. How the limits are set.