Biggest population changes in Panchkula district
Computed from 137 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Panchkula district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Khokhra (100) | 1,119 | 2,540 | +127.0% |
| 2 | Sabilpur (219) | 464 | 1,030 | +122.0% |
| 3 | Samanwa (268) | 436 | 866 | +98.6% |
| 4 | Dera Guru (184) | 337 | 653 | +93.8% |
| 5 | Sangrana (251) | 175 | 336 | +92.0% |
| 6 | Maranwala (95) | 3,964 | 6,796 | +71.4% |
| 7 | Orian (147) | 336 | 576 | +71.4% |
| 8 | Ramnagar (90) | 505 | 850 | +68.3% |
| 9 | Narainpur (207) | 402 | 675 | +67.9% |
| 10 | Palasra (242) | 533 | 860 | +61.4% |
| 11 | Shahpur (99) | 740 | 1,115 | +50.7% |
| 12 | Sitoo Majra (96) | 300 | 438 | +46.0% |
| 13 | Bhoj Koti (322) | 1,008 | 1,470 | +45.8% |
| 14 | Malla (174) | 671 | 962 | +43.4% |
| 15 | Kaimbwala (213) | 180 | 253 | +40.6% |
| 16 | Barwala (246) | 8,307 | 11,622 | +39.9% |
| 17 | Gorakhnath (97) | 586 | 800 | +36.5% |
| 18 | Nawannagar (98) | 1,388 | 1,884 | +35.7% |
| 19 | Bharauli (212) | 811 | 1,078 | +32.9% |
| 20 | Dakrog (169) | 415 | 551 | +32.8% |
Villages that shrank most in Panchkula district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Golpura (17) | 861 | 533 | -38.1% |
| 2 | Mauli (16) | 4,404 | 2,826 | -35.8% |
| 3 | Bhoj Matour (317) | 3,234 | 2,114 | -34.6% |
| 4 | Prem Pura (103) | 441 | 300 | -32.0% |
| 5 | Khol Albala (89) | 215 | 160 | -25.6% |
| 6 | Taparian (214) | 1,585 | 1,187 | -25.1% |
| 7 | Gawahi (170) | 260 | 209 | -19.6% |
| 8 | Jaspur (32) | 805 | 650 | -19.3% |
| 9 | Johlowal (129) | 1,711 | 1,412 | -17.5% |
| 10 | Paploha (139) | 2,670 | 2,205 | -17.4% |
| 11 | Charnian (128) | 1,618 | 1,362 | -15.8% |
| 12 | Natwal (23) | 2,312 | 1,966 | -15.0% |
| 13 | Bhareli (249) | 3,843 | 3,427 | -10.8% |
| 14 | Behbalpur (21) | 321 | 292 | -9.0% |
| 15 | Raipur Alias Sunderpur(244) | 845 | 800 | -5.3% |
| 16 | Dandlawar (249) | 834 | 790 | -5.3% |
| 17 | Toda (25) | 2,238 | 2,135 | -4.6% |
| 18 | Kona (93) | 1,800 | 1,724 | -4.2% |
| 19 | Ber Ghati (173) | 131 | 126 | -3.8% |
| 20 | Shamtoo (241) | 1,886 | 1,822 | -3.4% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.