GaonData

Biggest population changes in Ganganagar district

Computed from 1,714 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Ganganagar district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 10 Lm-A Anupgarh 119 292 +145.4%
2 7 H Anupgarh 102 250 +145.1%
3 Sardarpura Ladana Suratgarh 192 470 +144.8%
4 12 Kd Gharsana 321 785 +144.6%
5 15 Gd Gharsana 121 294 +143.0%
6 37 Ptp Sadulshahar 249 600 +141.0%
7 1 Gb-B Vijainagar 756 1,820 +140.7%
8 7 Gm Vijainagar 108 260 +140.7%
9 13 Lks Suratgarh 422 1,006 +138.4%
10 12 Bld Vijainagar 253 600 +137.2%
11 Bhojewala Suratgarh 642 1,497 +133.2%
12 1 Lm Suratgarh 348 810 +132.8%
13 18 Sjm Anupgarh 349 811 +132.4%
14 53 GG Karanpur 664 1,500 +125.9%
15 14 Shpd Suratgarh 162 362 +123.5%
16 6 H Anupgarh 1,604 3,560 +122.0%
17 4 W Karanpur 244 540 +121.3%
18 5 H Anupgarh 113 250 +121.2%
19 3 FFA Karanpur 137 300 +119.0%
20 4 Gd-B Gharsana 173 368 +112.7%

Villages that shrank most in Ganganagar district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 4 Gdm Suratgarh 235 144 -38.7%
2 44 Pbn Suratgarh 228 140 -38.6%
3 22 Ps(Rural) Raisinghnagar 2,223 1,382 -37.8%
4 1 Lsm Anupgarh 1,945 1,210 -37.8%
5 36 Gb Vijainagar 1,142 712 -37.6%
6 35 F Karanpur 208 130 -37.5%
7 5 As-B Vijainagar 1,341 840 -37.4%
8 4ML Ganganagar 1,553 975 -37.2%
9 8 Mld-B Gharsana 540 340 -37.0%
10 5 Sds Sadulshahar 175 112 -36.0%
11 Dulrasar Raisinghnagar 608 390 -35.9%
12 17 Gb Vijainagar 942 606 -35.7%
13 16 Sjm Anupgarh 229 148 -35.4%
14 14 Bgd Vijainagar 1,241 810 -34.7%
15 79 Rb-B Raisinghnagar 1,329 871 -34.5%
16 20 FF Karanpur 1,366 900 -34.1%
17 1 Sjm-A Anupgarh 174 115 -33.9%
18 4 Rjm Gharsana 119 79 -33.6%
19 87 Gb Anupgarh 1,781 1,200 -32.6%
20 Amarpura Jatan Suratgarh 2,043 1,379 -32.5%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 416 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 417 excluded in total. How the limits are set.