Biggest population changes in Krishnagiri district
Computed from 282 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Krishnagiri district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sengodachinnahalli | 4,197 | 10,448 | +148.9% |
| 2 | Belathur | 4,572 | 11,226 | +145.5% |
| 3 | Athipadi | 1,484 | 3,643 | +145.5% |
| 4 | Vellalapatti | 849 | 2,081 | +145.1% |
| 5 | Advanapalli | 239 | 575 | +140.6% |
| 6 | Sorakayalapalli | 466 | 1,092 | +134.3% |
| 7 | Nachikuppam | 1,393 | 3,227 | +131.7% |
| 8 | Chikkapoovathi | 2,405 | 5,517 | +129.4% |
| 9 | Marigampalli | 2,523 | 5,736 | +127.3% |
| 10 | Puliyampatti | 1,291 | 2,882 | +123.2% |
| 11 | Ettipatti | 2,318 | 5,061 | +118.3% |
| 12 | Chennasandiram | 2,755 | 5,935 | +115.4% |
| 13 | Kundalapalli | 520 | 1,092 | +110.0% |
| 14 | Kunchena Agraharam | 144 | 300 | +108.3% |
| 15 | Veppanapalli | 4,943 | 9,983 | +102.0% |
| 16 | Pachapanatti | 3,895 | 7,786 | +99.9% |
| 17 | Nellur | 3,874 | 7,640 | +97.2% |
| 18 | Polupalli | 2,639 | 5,171 | +96.0% |
| 19 | Karumandapathi | 483 | 944 | +95.5% |
| 20 | Suligunta | 5,353 | 10,448 | +95.2% |
Villages that shrank most in Krishnagiri district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enusonai | 2,709 | 1,698 | -37.3% |
| 2 | Chembarasanapalli | 5,312 | 3,335 | -37.2% |
| 3 | Kundarapalli | 4,702 | 2,986 | -36.5% |
| 4 | Marachandiram | 6,939 | 4,536 | -34.6% |
| 5 | Samakavandanvalasai | 519 | 350 | -32.6% |
| 6 | Chowttahalli | 8,992 | 6,102 | -32.1% |
| 7 | Battavarapalli | 704 | 500 | -29.0% |
| 8 | Agaram | 5,697 | 4,050 | -28.9% |
| 9 | Andevanapalli | 4,908 | 3,497 | -28.8% |
| 10 | Puligunta | 8,365 | 6,030 | -27.9% |
| 11 | Kadappasandampatti | 5,816 | 4,208 | -27.6% |
| 12 | Kollanur | 621 | 455 | -26.7% |
| 13 | Jagirkarupalli | 1,905 | 1,471 | -22.8% |
| 14 | Velampatti | 541 | 418 | -22.7% |
| 15 | Collapalli | 440 | 350 | -20.4% |
| 16 | Karukkanahalli | 6,006 | 4,800 | -20.1% |
| 17 | Elachyur | 1,253 | 1,025 | -18.2% |
| 18 | Naickanur | 3,207 | 2,660 | -17.1% |
| 19 | Reddivalasai | 1,327 | 1,111 | -16.3% |
| 20 | Alur | 3,018 | 2,555 | -15.3% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
3 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.