Biggest population changes in Thanjavur district
Computed from 591 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Thanjavur district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kattayankadu Ukkadai | 610 | 1,485 | +143.4% |
| 2 | Gangadharapuram | 738 | 1,784 | +141.7% |
| 3 | Thirumangaicheri | 1,859 | 4,433 | +138.5% |
| 4 | Sivapuram | 1,133 | 2,692 | +137.6% |
| 5 | Melachittakadu | 206 | 487 | +136.4% |
| 6 | Chinna Ammankudi | 419 | 978 | +133.4% |
| 7 | Rayamundanpatti | 1,418 | 3,284 | +131.6% |
| 8 | Andikkadu | 1,503 | 3,439 | +128.8% |
| 9 | Mannarsamudram | 1,795 | 4,076 | +127.1% |
| 10 | Vendayampatti | 1,449 | 3,278 | +126.2% |
| 11 | Madathikkadu | 1,647 | 3,640 | +121.0% |
| 12 | Pandaravadai | 8,420 | 18,567 | +120.5% |
| 13 | Regunathapuram | 283 | 618 | +118.4% |
| 14 | Mavadukurichi East | 1,555 | 3,356 | +115.8% |
| 15 | Ammayagaram | 1,110 | 2,353 | +112.0% |
| 16 | Andakottai | 398 | 838 | +110.5% |
| 17 | Vadiakkadu | 950 | 2,000 | +110.5% |
| 18 | Manakkadu | 1,764 | 3,673 | +108.2% |
| 19 | Sarukkai | 2,529 | 5,243 | +107.3% |
| 20 | Panchanathipuram | 662 | 1,359 | +105.3% |
Villages that shrank most in Thanjavur district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mathur | 5,773 | 3,524 | -39.0% |
| 2 | Manjamalli | 5,422 | 3,321 | -38.8% |
| 3 | Vallam Pudursethi | 3,117 | 1,960 | -37.1% |
| 4 | Chatramthokkalikadu | 718 | 453 | -36.9% |
| 5 | Thondarampet West | 1,888 | 1,200 | -36.4% |
| 6 | Eachankudi | 2,948 | 1,900 | -35.5% |
| 7 | Palathali | 480 | 310 | -35.4% |
| 8 | Thepperumanallur | 10,020 | 6,477 | -35.4% |
| 9 | Alangudi | 1,964 | 1,270 | -35.3% |
| 10 | Unjividuthy | 3,405 | 2,211 | -35.1% |
| 11 | Poovathur | 2,263 | 1,470 | -35.0% |
| 12 | Kuruvikarambai I | 3,768 | 2,481 | -34.2% |
| 13 | Kabisthalam | 6,630 | 4,383 | -33.9% |
| 14 | Arasapattu | 2,866 | 1,902 | -33.6% |
| 15 | Thondarampet East | 1,659 | 1,107 | -33.3% |
| 16 | Pethanachivayal | 854 | 574 | -32.8% |
| 17 | MilatturI V sethi | 1,662 | 1,118 | -32.7% |
| 18 | Palavathankattalai | 6,752 | 4,550 | -32.6% |
| 19 | Thekkur | 6,021 | 4,065 | -32.5% |
| 20 | Kullangarai | 2,421 | 1,641 | -32.2% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.