Biggest population changes in Amethi district
Computed from 836 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Amethi district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Balchandra Pur | 273 | 680 | +149.1% |
| 2 | Dhani Jalalpur | 685 | 1,682 | +145.6% |
| 3 | Pure Udhao | 267 | 653 | +144.6% |
| 4 | Saraiya Salarpur | 914 | 2,230 | +144.0% |
| 5 | Chak Jangali | 121 | 290 | +139.7% |
| 6 | Ram Bakshgarh | 1,628 | 3,900 | +139.6% |
| 7 | Beeghapur | 505 | 1,200 | +137.6% |
| 8 | Sarai Barwand Singh | 984 | 2,314 | +135.2% |
| 9 | Thaura | 2,403 | 5,560 | +131.4% |
| 10 | Mohuddinpur | 854 | 1,950 | +128.3% |
| 11 | Kapoorpur | 565 | 1,245 | +120.3% |
| 12 | Maharajpur | 296 | 652 | +120.3% |
| 13 | Gundur | 1,020 | 2,231 | +118.7% |
| 14 | Chak Mamha | 663 | 1,446 | +118.1% |
| 15 | Chhajju Pur | 462 | 980 | +112.1% |
| 16 | Bhetuwa | 1,680 | 3,500 | +108.3% |
| 17 | Mirpur | 267 | 550 | +106.0% |
| 18 | Gopiya Pur | 294 | 600 | +104.1% |
| 19 | Bhadaw | 2,245 | 4,500 | +100.5% |
| 20 | Rampurchaudhari | 1,503 | 3,000 | +99.6% |
Villages that shrank most in Amethi district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asrafpur | 2,513 | 1,568 | -37.6% |
| 2 | Bhikhipur | 2,900 | 1,840 | -36.5% |
| 3 | Lokepur | 1,107 | 750 | -32.3% |
| 4 | Khaunpur Buzurg | 1,717 | 1,175 | -31.6% |
| 5 | Khargipur Dubey | 243 | 182 | -25.1% |
| 6 | Mahnaa | 547 | 422 | -22.9% |
| 7 | Bhaganpur | 981 | 796 | -18.9% |
| 8 | Piper Pur | 6,825 | 5,550 | -18.7% |
| 9 | Mahimanpur | 3,059 | 2,500 | -18.3% |
| 10 | Bahorakha | 1,775 | 1,460 | -17.8% |
| 11 | Ramraipur | 740 | 610 | -17.6% |
| 12 | Kishundaspur | 271 | 225 | -17.0% |
| 13 | Lahna | 1,974 | 1,645 | -16.7% |
| 14 | Bhu Siyanwa | 1,901 | 1,684 | -11.4% |
| 15 | Mangal Pur | 304 | 274 | -9.9% |
| 16 | Mayas | 2,207 | 2,000 | -9.4% |
| 17 | Bhretha | 3,032 | 2,750 | -9.3% |
| 18 | Sakrawan | 1,322 | 1,200 | -9.2% |
| 19 | Jamal Patti | 483 | 439 | -9.1% |
| 20 | Kastoori Pur | 1,473 | 1,400 | -5.0% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.